FARMERS’ PERCEPTIONS ON EXPANSION OF A NEW TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF COCONUT-BASED INTERCROPPING IN SRI LANKA

  • M.T.N. Fernando
  • M.E. Daw
  • I.E. Edwards
Keywords: Monocropping, Coconut Cultivation, New Technology

Abstract

Monocropping, the widely practiced traditional coconut cultivation system in Sri Lanka, utilizes bio-physical resources sub optimally, generating low returns to growers than its potential under an intensive cultivation alternative, coconut-based intercropping (CBI). Despite concerted efforts of successive governments, the adoption of CBI systems by farmers is low. This study investigates the farmers' perceptions of CBI on the premise that the understanding of farmers’ perceptions of a new technology is important to identify the causes for the low adoption of that technology. Data were gathered by a field survey of 113 and 37 intercroppers and monocroppers respectively, in three main coconut-growing districts, namely Kurunegala, Gampaha and Puttalam, using a structured questionnaire supplemented with open-ended questions, through a single visit. Percentage analysis supplemented with a simple scoring device was employed to analyze the farmer's perceptions of CBI. Intercroppers objectives of intercropping, the constraints they face in expanding intercropping, reasons for non-adoption of CBI by present monocroppers and the suggestions of present intercroppers to further expand the CBI, all in the order of importance, are presented.

References

Abeysinghe, A. (1990). Fertilizer subsidy and rice imports. Economic Review, 15(11), 18-21.

Feder, G., Just, R. E. and Zilberman, D.(1982). Adoption of agricultural innovation in developing countries: A survey. World Bank Staff Working Papers, No. 542, The World Bank, Washington, D. C., USA.

Fernando, N., Edwards, I. and Daw, M. (1996). Coconut-based intercropping systems in Sri Lanka. Proceedings of Aberdeen University Agriculture Graduates Association, 8, 34-35.

Flinn, J. C., Jayasuriya, S. and Knight, C. G. (1980). Incorporating multiple objectives in planning models of low-resource farmers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 24, 35-45.

Herath, H. M. G., Hardaker, J. B., and Anderson, J. R. (1982). Choice of varieties by Sri Lankan rice farmers: Comparing alternative decision models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64, 87-93.

Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decision with Multiple Objectives. Preference and Value Trade Off. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Nair, P. K. R. and Balakrishnan, T. K. (1976). Pattern of light utilization by canopies in a coconut/cocoa crop combination. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 46, 453-462.

Reynolds, S. G. (1995). Pasture-Cattle-Coconut Systems. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific (RAPA), RAPA Publication 1995/7, Bangkok, Thailand.

Romero, C. and Rehman, T. (1989). Multiple Criteria Analysis for Agricultural Decisions. Elsevier.

Weerahewa, H. L. J. (1991). An empirical test of multiple objective vs. single objective decision making in farming systems at Hanguranketa and Walapane areas: Nuwara Eliya district. Unpublished MPhil thesis, PGIA, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Published
2003-06-01
How to Cite
M.T.N. Fernando, M.E. Daw, & I.E. Edwards. (2003). FARMERS’ PERCEPTIONS ON EXPANSION OF A NEW TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF COCONUT-BASED INTERCROPPING IN SRI LANKA. CORD, 19(01), 34. https://doi.org/10.37833/cord.v19i01.367
Section
Articles