PHYSICOCHEMICAL, FUNCTIONAL AND SENSORY PROPERTIES OF PROTEIN EXTRACTED FROM DESICCATED COCONUT
Abstract
Coconut protein (CNP) was extracted from desiccated coconut in 1.0 M sodium chloride (1:15), precipitated by HCI, ultra filtered, and freeze‑dried. The physicochemical, functional, and sensory characteristics of the material were compared with those of soy protein. The composition and chemical analyses included measurements of protein, fat, moisture, carbohydrate, ash, minerals, and amino acids. Other measurements included determination of die contents of sulfhydryl and disulfide groups, hydrophobicity values, and electrophoretic patterns of CNP and soy protein. The bulk density of the protein preparations was also measured. Chemical analyses showed that CNP was comparable in overall composition to the reference soy protein with the exception of high sodium content (4.7%). Amino acid analysis revealed a higher content of arginine and a lower content of aspartic acid and lysine. A test for relatedness among, proteins (S ΔQ) showed very little similarity between the amino acid profiles of the two protein entities. CNP was found to be more hydrophobic than soy protein and contained slightly less sulthydryl and disulfide groups. The disparity in the above values was reflected in dissimilarity in the electrophoretic patterns between CNP and soy protein. CNP exhibited a lower solubility but possessed a similar water binding and a higher lipid absorption capacity than soy protein. Sensory evaluation using crackers prepared with different amounts of the two proteins showed that crackers with added CNP were preferred over crackers with added soy protein. The overall results of this study suggest a potential use of CNP as an alternative protein source to soy protein for use in manufactured foods where solubility is not a critical factor.
References
2. Woodroof, J.G. 1979 Coconuts: Production, Processing, and Products, 2nd Ed. p. 8 10. AVI Publishing Company, Inc., Westport, CT.
3. Food and Agriculture Organizations of The United Nations (1990) FAO yearbook, Production, 44: 170.
4. Rasyid, F. 1992. Ph.D. dissertation. The Ohio State University. Columbus, Ohio.
5. Association of Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC) 1990 Official Methods of the Association of Official Analytical Chemist. 5th Ed. AOAC, Inc. Arlington, Virginia.
6. Mohammadzadeh k, A., Feeney, R. E., Samuels, R. B. and Smith, L. M. 1967 Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 147:583
7. Mangino, M. E., Fritsch, D. A., Liao, S. Y., Fayerman, A. M., and Harper, W. J. 1985 N. Z. J. Dairy Sci. and Tech. 20:103¬-107.
8. Kato, A. and Nakai, S. 1980 Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 576:269.
9. Bigelow, C. 1967. J. Tlireoret. Biol. 16:187 211.
10. Bevefidge, T., Toma, S. J., and Nakai, S. 1874 J. Food Sci. 39:49 5 1.
11. Laemmli, U. K. 1970 Nature (London), 227:680.
12. Wilkinson, L. 1989a Systat: The System for Statistics SYSTAT. Inc. Evanston, Illinois.
13. Wilkinson L. 1989b Sygraph: The System for Graphics. SYSTAT. Inc. Evanston, Illinois.
14. Voutsinas, L. P. Cheung. E., and Nakd. S. 1983 1. Food ci. 48:26 32.
15. Bearden, J. M. 1978 Arch Biochem. Biophys. 533: 525 529.
16. Aguilera, J. M. and Kosikowski, F. V. 1978 J. Dairy Sci. 61(l1):1548 1556.
17. Lin, M. J. Y., Humbert, E. S., and Sosulski, E. S. J. Food Sci. 41:286 292.
18. Wang, J. C. and Kinsela, J. E. 1976 J. Food Sci. 41:286 292.
19. Kramer, A. 1956 Food Technol. 10:391 392.
20. Kinsella, J. E. 1982. In Food Proteins; Fox, P. and Condon, l., Eds.; Applied Science Publishers. New York. p. 51 103.
21. Mangino, M. E. 1984 J. Dairy Sci. 67:2711 2722
22. Moff, C.V. 1990 J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.67(5):265 271
23. Kinsella, J. E. 1979. Functional properties of soy proteins. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 56(3) : 242 258.
24. Hennansson, A. M. and Ak esson, C. 1975 J. Food Sci. 40:595 602.
25. Marehalonis, J. and Weltman, J. K. 1971 Comp. Biochem, Physiol. 38B:609.
26. Rasyid, F., Manullang, M., and Hansen, P.M.T. 1992 Food Hydrocolloids 6(3):301 414.
27. Waugh, D. F. 1954 Adv. Protein Chem. 9:325 437.
28. Fisher, H. F. 1964 Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. Wash. 51:1285 1291.
29. Gonzalez, O. N. and Tanchuco, R. H. 1977 Phil. J. Coco. Studies 11(3):21 30.
30. Sawyer, W. H. 1969 J. Dairy Sci. 52:1347 1355.
31. Hutton, C. W. and Camphell. A. M. 1977. Functional properfies of a soy concentrate and a soy isolate in simple systems. Nitrogen solubility index and water absorption. J. Food Sci. 42:454456.
32. Philips, R. D. and Stemberg, M. (1979) J. Food Sci. 44:1152 1161.
33. Winggerd, W. H. 1971 J. Dairy Sci. 54:1234 1236.
34. Robinson, B. P., Short, J. L. and Marshall, K. R. 1976 N. Z. J. Dairy Sci. Technol. l1: 114 118.
35. Fleming, S. E., Sosulski, F. W., Kilara, A., and Humbert, E. S. 1974 J. Food Sci. 39:188 191.
36. Hung, S. C. and Zayas, J. F. 1992 J. Food Sci. 57:372 376.
37. Kinsella, J. E. 1976 CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 7:219 280.
38. Johnson, D. W. 1970 J. Am. Oii Chem. Soc. 47(10):402 407.
39. Hagenmaier, R. 1972 J. Food Sci. 37:965 966.
40. Scopes,R.K.1987 Protein Purification: Principles and Practices. 2nd Ed. Springer Verlag. New York Inc.
41. Pomeranz, Y. 1991 Functional Properties of Food Components. 2nd Ed. Academic Press Inc. San Diego, Califomia.
42. Katz, E. E. and Labuza, T. P. 1981 J. Food Sci. 48:403.409.